King Jehoram, Felix Manalo and Judas Iscariot
Felix Manalo and the Trinity
-----------------------------------------------
I came across this in the web some time back. How the numbers add up is a bit amusing. Comments welcome.
The number of the beast
Revelation 13:18
This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man's number. His number is 666.
Note: For greek numeral reference, kindly look here:
http://www.clas.ufl.edu/users/rhatch/pages/03-Sci-Rev/SCI-REV-Teaching/HIS-SCI-STUDY-GUIDE/0025_ancientGreekNumerals.html
Check out the the name Felix Ysagun Manalo -
Greek Felix: 605
Roman Felix: 61
605 + 61 = 666
Greek Ysagun: 660
Roman Ysagun: 6
660 + 6 = 666
Year INC was founded: 1914
Roman Ysagun: 6
Greek Manalo: 192
Roman Manalo: 1050
1914 - (6 + 192 + 1050) = 666
9 comments:
Well, next time, I wish to hear from you getting inside the INC system, listen to some of their important doctrines and attend to one of their worships. Until then I could trust that you have enough knowledge about them before you could evaluate them. And good luck. Thanks for posting.
Thanks. I could say that I know enough of INCs important doctrines, probably even more than most members who attend their twice a week worship services. Keep on posting!
IT IS EVIDENT THAT U ARE TRYING HARD TO MAKE AN EQUATION AND GET THE SCORE OF 666 BUT HELL UR SUMMATION IS NON CONSTANT AND THAT PROVES UR A LIAR.. IT GOES ON THE LAST PART WHEN U INCLUDED THE CHURCHES FOUNDATION AND MIXING THE TOTAL OF YSAGUN UNREASONABLY (CLEARLY UR PATHETIC AND HOPELESS)
I THINK U SHOULD BE THE ONE TAGGED AS 666 WHAT A SHAME ON UR BLOG
For Felix and Ysagun, I don't think the author did not try that hard. With those alone, you get 666 twice already. The last part was merely icing on the cake. And why do you say that since it the summation is non-constant, it proves I am a liar? How is that so? Please expound.
And how is it that I be tagged 666? Can you show the computation?
And my point here is not to show that Felix Y. Manalo is the Beast. My point is that how easy it is to contrive something to get someone to have a number of 666, which some people assign to the pope (vicarius filii dei), Ronald Reagan (Ronald - 6, Wilson - 6, Reagan - 6), Bill Gates (William I Gates in ASCII characters), etc. So my point is not to say FYM is the beast, rather to caution people not to fall into the trap of believing everything you read.
Gusto ko ang calculation mo pero masusuportahan mo ba ng biblia ang paggamit mo ng Roman at Greek? Biblikal ba ito? Sa pagkaalam ko ay si Jesus ang maglalantad ng mga lihim sa kadiliman. Sugo ka ba? Ano ang sinasabi ng biblia tungkol sa iyo upang maniwala kaming totoo ang iyong sinasabi?
I am not a prophet. And I am not claiming what was written is true. In fact, what I am trying to acomplish is far from that. My message is how easy it is for anyone to create these. The bible itself was very vague on this. It does not even say that it is the letters that should signify number equivalents. As to using Roman and Greek, I can easily say that in the time of Christ, the local langauge was Aramaic (which the gospels refer to as Hebrew) but additionally, Greek and Roman (Latin) were the languages of commerce and admisitration. Note that in addition to Aramaic, the sign fastened on Jesus's cross was in Greek and Roman. (John 19:20)
Tama ka diyan, kapatid. Ang ginagawang panloloko ng mga INC regarding sa Vicarius Filii Dei Myth ay isang kasinungalingang nakuha sa mga Adventista.
I just can't believe people jump to conclusion to what was this blogger (pasugo) wanted to share as FYM is the beast where in fact its not (so defensive INC? ). lets try to be open minded the blogger did not categorically mention FYM was the BEAST he simply made him an example which people can do the same to come out with the beast number.
really appreciate this blog I hope a lot of people read this so they can be made aware that not everything published are true with just simply applying the basic and picking the right example you can came up with everything.
I am more frightened to what extent the INC is going to protect its past from catching up with it. I am more frightened how its new generation of members, especially the younger ones - have developed a deep hatred for anything that isn't Iglesia. They have developed a new generation of followers who have little respect (and manners) for the free & solemn practice of religion.
With their rising influence in Philippine society, I do not know how they will contribute to its progress by giving rise to a generation of bigots.
Post a Comment